From: Dave Kleikamp Subject: Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:30:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1173839458.8125.5.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> References: <20070312220426.2b1d7aaa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <45F6BDC9.8080205@redhat.com> <1173799745.9662.4.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> <20070313170748.3e0bb466.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, astralstorm@gmail.com, kalpak@clusterfs.com To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:37776 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933811AbXCNCbC (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:31:02 -0400 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2E2V1lM014580 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:31:01 -0400 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l2E2V1kM062282 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:31:01 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l2E2V00X030788 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:31:00 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20070313170748.3e0bb466.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 17:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:29:05 -0500 Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 10:05 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > . > > > There were later patches posted to the list after this version, I think, which > > > are not yet in Ted's tree... I'll find some time today to test the "take3" version > > > on x86_64, unless someone beats me to it. > > > > I didn't quite beat you to it, but I did make a diff to bring > > 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 in tune with the "take3" patch. It makes the code easier > > to understand, but I'm not sure if it contains anything to fix the bug. > > Code inspection hasn't gotten me any closer to figuring out what's > > wrong. > > > > Shaggy > > It's possible that I screwed up merging Ted's tree into mainline - it spat > some rejects, and needs updating to 2.6.21-rc3. I think your merge of Ted's tree is okay, although his tree could use some cleanup. The patch Eric sent on top of mine should clear up this problem. I'll try to get Ted's tree up to date, or find someone with some more spare time to take over maintenance. -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center