From: Jean-Pierre Dion Subject: Re: Ext4 benchmarks Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 16:55:37 +0200 Message-ID: <46111969.8090006@bull.net> References: <45FFFBAA.6080404@bull.net> <4600A1BD.80700@us.ibm.com> <460A3010.6080201@bull.net> <460A5112.4040709@emc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jrs@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Ric Wheeler Return-path: Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:47256 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965555AbXDBOzT (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:55:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <460A5112.4040709@emc.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Hi Ric, that may be useful. Checking with the team here and tell you. Thanks. jean-pierre Ric Wheeler wrote: > > Jean-Pierre Dion wrote: >> Hi Jose, >> >> thank you for the feedback. >> >> We took your remarks into account and we are doing some perfs with >> iozone (close to desktop activity, mono-thread) and ffsb (allows to >> run benchs >> in a multi-thread activity like a server does, different blocks >> sizes...). >> >> We compare ext3 and ext4 (with extents, w/ and w/o del alloc...)... >> >> We will publish the results on bullopensource.org >> >> >> jean-pierre >> > I also have a benchmark that stresses a heavy synchronous write > workload that I can run. > > ric > >