From: Valerie Clement Subject: Re: Ext4 devel interlock meeting minutes (April 23, 2007) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:51:46 +0200 Message-ID: <462E1982.9020307@bull.net> References: <462D42CA.50509@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <462D9CE9.1040402@clusterfs.com> <462E0E5A.6030707@bull.net> <462E124C.30706@clusterfs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Avantika Mathur , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Mingming Cao To: Alex Tomas Return-path: Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:45000 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751682AbXDXOwi (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:52:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <462E124C.30706@clusterfs.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Alex Tomas wrote: > Valerie Clement wrote: >> Here are the results I obtain with a 2.6.17-rc7 kernel to delete a=20 >> 100GB file: >> >> ext3 : real 2m35.048s user 0m0.000s sys 0m6.424s >> ext4 : real 0m11.160s user 0m0.000s sys 0m5.532s >> xfs : real 0m0.377s user 0m0.004s sys 0m0.004s >=20 > would be very interesting to know how much IO was done to remove the = file > and actual fragmentation in all the cases. >=20 > thanks, Alex >=20 Ok, I will do it. Val=E9rie