From: coly Subject: Re: which kernel version should I submit patch ? Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 13:05:37 +0800 Message-ID: <1178168737.30661.4.camel@colyT43.site> References: <1178129628.30661.1.camel@colyT43.site> <1178147812.24273.26.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-ext4 To: Badari Pulavarty Return-path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.224]:40321 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767390AbXECFDx (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 01:03:53 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 76so404831wra for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 22:03:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1178147812.24273.26.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Badari: Thanks, maybe Ted's tree is a good choice :-) Best regards. Coly =E5=9C=A8 2007-05-02=E4=B8=89=E7=9A=84 16:16 -0700=EF=BC=8CBadari Pulav= arty=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 02:13 +0800, coly wrote: > > Hi, list. > >=20 > > I find these days 2.6.21 released. If I will submit patches for ext= 4dev, > > should I generate the patch against 2.6.21 ? >=20 >=20 > If you find a bug in ext4 on 2.6.21 - yes, generate against 2.6.21. >=20 > Make sure its not already fixed in -mm or Ted's ext4 tree. >=20 > http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/ >=20 > Thanks, > Badari >=20