From: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fallocate() implementation in i86, x86_64 and powerpc Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 20:50:44 +1000 Message-ID: <17985.42884.971318.859402@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20070330071417.GI355@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20070417125514.GA7574@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070418130600.GW5967@schatzie.adilger.int> <20070420135146.GA21352@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070420145918.GY355@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20070424121632.GA10136@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070426175056.GA25321@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070426180332.GA7209@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070503212955.b1b6443c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <17978.47502.786970.196554@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070509101507.GA26056@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , "Amit K. Arora" , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, cmm@us.ibm.com To: suparna@in.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:41294 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750719AbXEIKvl (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 06:51:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070509101507.GA26056@in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Suparna Bhattacharya writes: > > This looks like it will have the same problem on s390 as > > sys_sync_file_range. Maybe the prototype should be: > > > > asmlinkage long sys_fallocate(loff_t offset, loff_t len, int fd, int mode) > > Yes, but the trouble is that there was a contrary viewpoint preferring that fd > first be maintained as a convention like other syscalls (see the following > posts) Of course the interface used by an application program would have the fd first. Glibc can do the translation. Paul.