From: Eric Subject: Re: ext2/3/4 online defrag Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 04:50:01 -0700 Message-ID: <1178797801.32324.13.camel@eric-laptop> References: <1178770799.26695.11.camel@eric-laptop> <020201c792e4$86569b10$4168010a@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OAanIp8cw1OWgKxIzkxg" To: linux-ext4 Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181]:18041 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755051AbXEJLuJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 07:50:09 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so446497pyi for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 04:50:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <020201c792e4$86569b10$4168010a@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org --=-OAanIp8cw1OWgKxIzkxg Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 18:20 +0900, Takashi Sato wrote: > > *Some patches exist that provide preliminary support for online defrag > > in the ext3 driver, but interest in improving/integrating these patches > > is low. > > I'm working on the development of online defrag for ext4. This makes sense. I didn't notice that the HTTP list archive was sorting my search results by relevance instead of date, so it appeared that the last post about online defrag was made in January. > Any comments are very welcome. I think I have a lot of reading to do before I go making comments. Thanks, Eric --=-OAanIp8cw1OWgKxIzkxg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGQwboe2L37HVup3ARAiOpAJ9uo6D3Gt4P2LGxWrK0L4aGEzKTwgCfVRWB 0PMXPArSeyXOoJf+dJXOsOA= =0okD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-OAanIp8cw1OWgKxIzkxg--