From: sftf Subject: Checksuming metadata+data Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:12:37 +0600 Message-ID: <488612090.20070517101237@mail.ru> Reply-To: sftf Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx28.mail.ru ([194.67.23.67]:33233 "EHLO mx28.mail.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758501AbXEQDPq (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 23:15:46 -0400 Received: from mx33.mail.ru (mx33.mail.ru [194.67.23.194]) by mx28.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id B58FB704A54 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 07:13:01 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [195.162.52.178] (port=56349 helo=[192.168.2.1]) by mx33.mail.ru with asmtp id 1HoWPv-000Djh-00 for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 07:12:39 +0400 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Why to not implement two modes (via create/mount options): 1. Checksuming metadata only 2. Checksuming metadata+data (i.e. checksuming ALL)