From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] readahead: introduce PG_readahead Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 00:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20070516224752.500812933@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <379355695.83536@ustc.edu.cn> <20070518232824.9917d794.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <379577826.15160@ustc.edu.cn> <20070519082504.8baa8d19.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <379630538.31710@ustc.edu.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Jens Axboe , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Pratt , Ram Pai , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: Fengguang Wu Return-path: Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:54045 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759089AbXETHKd (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2007 03:10:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <379630538.31710@ustc.edu.cn> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 20 May 2007, Fengguang Wu wrote: > The reuse code would look like the attached one. > It still needs more testing, and would fail if Christoph reuses > PG_reclaim in higher order pagecache in the future. Do not worry about that. All higher order pagecache patchsets remove that sharing because we will then need these pages on the LRU and thus PG_reclaim cannot be shared anymore.