From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: e2fsprogs coverity patch Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:49:12 -0500 Message-ID: <465C75A8.5080506@redhat.com> References: <200702100211.l1A2BTRb007321@igsi.llnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, adilger@clusterfs.com, wartens2@llnl.gov To: "Brian D. Behlendorf" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54556 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758017AbXE2StO (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 14:49:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200702100211.l1A2BTRb007321@igsi.llnl.gov> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Brian D. Behlendorf wrote: > Lawrence Livermore National Labs recently ran the source code > analysis tool Coverity over the e2fsprogs-1.39 source to see > if it would identify any significant bugs. The analysis > turned up 38 mostly minor issues which are enumerated here > with patches. We went through and resolved these issues > but would love to see these mostly minor changes reviewed > and commited upstream. Did cid-34.diff get lost? -Eric