From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: e2fsprogs coverity patch Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 21:01:35 -0500 Message-ID: <465CDAFF.9060807@redhat.com> References: <200702100211.l1A2BTRb007321@igsi.llnl.gov> <465C75A8.5080506@redhat.com> <20070529205141.GB5181@schatzie.adilger.int> <465C938C.3060101@redhat.com> <20070529222009.GA669@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andreas Dilger , "Brian D. Behlendorf" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, wartens2@llnl.gov To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39471 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751049AbXE3CBm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 22:01:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070529222009.GA669@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Theodore Tso wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:56:44PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> I still have it in my "apply atop 1.39-WIP" series, so it appears not >>> to have made it into Ted's repo. I'm including the patch again for >>> posterity. >> Thanks Andreas - near as I can tell, it never made it to the list. > > Yeah, I wondered about that numbering discontinuity --- but IIRC it > wasn't the only one. I had assumed that the "missing" cid's were ones > were human examination of the Coverity report lead to the conclusion > that it really wasn't a problem.... > > - Ted I only knew about it because I had a RHEL bug with it attached :) Thanks, -Eric