From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: Online defragmentation Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:10:34 -0600 Message-ID: <20070530141034.GL5181@schatzie.adilger.int> References: <465D2202.60600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Takashi Sato , linux-ext4 To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from mail.clusterfs.com ([206.168.112.78]:59614 "EHLO mail.clusterfs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753438AbXE3OKh (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2007 10:10:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <465D2202.60600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On May 30, 2007 12:34 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > I haven't tested the defrag code. This came up when i was doing the > online migration. With large file having large number of fragmented > blocks I was getting the below error during the iput of the temporary > inode. > > "ext4_free_blocks Freeing blocks not in datazone ...." This shouldn't happen regardless of whether you are doing defrag or not, since it will cause the filesystem to go read-only. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc.