From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: Add EXT4_IOC_MIGRATE ioctl Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:24:29 -0600 Message-ID: <20070612092429.GK5181@schatzie.adilger.int> References: <20070612064757.GA12991@skywalker.home.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from mail.clusterfs.com ([206.168.112.78]:35207 "EHLO mail.clusterfs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751260AbXFLJYa (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:24:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070612064757.GA12991@skywalker.home.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Jun 12, 2007 12:17 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > The below patch add ioctl for migrating ext3 indirect block mapped inode > to ext4 extent mapped inode. How does this relate to the migrate ioctl used by Takashi in the current ext4 defragmenter patch series? Ideally, the code shouldn't really care whether it is migrating from/to a block-mapped or extent-mapped file. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc.