From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] zero_user_page conversion Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:51:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20070623095157.5a574afb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <4679A558.1010107@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4679A558.1010107@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: samba-technical-bounces+gnsi-samba-technical=m.gmane.org@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-technical-bounces+gnsi-samba-technical=m.gmane.org@lists.samba.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:08:24 -0500 Eric Sandeen wrote: > Use zero_user_page() in cifs, ocfs2, ext4, and gfs2 where possible. One patch, splattered across four maintainers, each of whom maintain separate trees. Sigh. Please, don't. _someone_ has to split this up, and it might as well not be me.