From: Kalpak Shah Subject: Re: [PATCH] Endianness bugs in e2fsck Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:43:59 +0530 Message-ID: <1182759239.6016.8.camel@garfield> References: <1182331988.9772.7.camel@garfield> <20070623003646.GD22889@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4 , Andreas Dilger To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from mail.clusterfs.com ([206.168.112.78]:60581 "EHLO mail.clusterfs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750781AbXFYINc (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 04:13:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070623003646.GD22889@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 20:36 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 03:03:08PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: > > In ext2fs_swap_inode_full() only the first (GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + > > i_extra_isize)bytes are copied into inode. The rest of the inode is > > not zeroed. So memset the inode to zero if swapfs is enabled. > > This was due to the bug where we weren't dealing with the i_extra_size > correctly, right? ext2fs_swap_inode_full *should* be swapping the > extra fields and copying it into the inode. If not, that's should be > the real bug, and adding the memset(inode, 0, bufset) doesn't seem to > be useful. > > Am I missing something? Hi Ted, In e2fsck_pass1(), a buffer is allocated for the scratch inode, inode = (struct ext2_inode *) e2fsck_allocate_memory(ctx, inode_size, "scratch inode"); Now on big-endian systems, while swapping, ext2fs_swap_inode_full() swaps only 128+extra_isize bytes and the EAs if they are present. Now if inode N has EAs, (and this is the inode in the "scratch inode") then inode N+1 also carries seems to have them since the "scratch inode" was never zeroed. In ext2fs_swap_inode_full(), this occurs: if (ext2fs_swab32(*eaf) != EXT2_EXT_ATTR_MAGIC) return; /* it seems no magic here */ So as I said only the first 128+extra_isize bytes are actually copied into the *to* inode. Thanks, Kalpak. > > - Ted