From: David Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:39:21 +1000 Message-ID: <20070628003921.GW989688@sgi.com> References: <20070614120413.GD86004887@sgi.com> <20070614193347.GN5181@schatzie.adilger.int> <20070625132810.GA1951@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070625134500.GE1951@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070625150320.GA8686@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070625214626.GJ5181@schatzie.adilger.int> <20070626231431.GO31489@sgi.com> <20070627034915.GR6652@schatzie.adilger.int> <20070627133657.GQ989688@sgi.com> <1182986916.15488.88.camel@edge.yarra.acx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Chinner , Andreas Dilger , xfs-oss , "Amit K. Arora" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, suparna@in.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com To: Nathan Scott Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1182986916.15488.88.camel@edge.yarra.acx> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:28:36AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 23:36 +1000, David Chinner wrote: > > .... Allows setup_swap_extents() to use preallocated files on XFS > > filesystems for swap files without ever needing to convert them. > > Using unwritten extents (as opposed to the MKSWAP flag mentioned > earlier) has the unfortunate down side of requiring transactions, > possibly additional IO, and memory allocation during swap. (but, > this patch should probably go in regardless, as teaching generic > code about unwritten extents is not a bad idea). I don't think it does - swapfile I/O looks like it goes direct to bio without passing through the filesystem. When the swapfile is mapped, it scans and records the extent map of the entire swapfile in a separate structure and AFAICT the swap code uses that built map without touching the filesystem at all. If that is true then the written/unwritten state of the extents is irrelevant; all we need is allocated disk space for the file and swapping should work. And it's not like anyone should be reading the contents of that swapfile through the filesystem, either. ;) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group