From: Dave Kleikamp Subject: Re: block groups with no inode tables Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:40:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1184089232.13379.6.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> References: <20070710121221.5478a1e3@rx8> <1184088605.17636.1.camel@colyt43.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jose R. Santos" , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: coly li Return-path: Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:43163 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755192AbXGJRke (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:40:34 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6AHeYsS005191 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:40:34 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l6AHeYU1514574 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:40:34 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l6AHeX17009177 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:40:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1184088605.17636.1.camel@colyt43.site> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 01:30 +0800, coly li wrote: > Hi, once we decide to do this, how about storing inode inside the > directory ? Which directory? > IMHO, the latter one is more attractive :-) Sounds like a mess to me. Consider ln and mv. > Coly -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center