From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:00:41 -0400
Message-ID: <1184119241.20193.27.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1183275416.4010.125.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20070710163027.1bf7e94e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reply-To: cmm@us.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1760750AbXGKFA4@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070710163027.1bf7e94e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
> Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
> 
> I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are.  A link to a suitable
> changlog for those patches would do in a pinch.  Preferable would be to
> write a proper changelog for this patch.
> 
I found the original patch
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=115091699809181&w=2

Andreas or Kalpak, is changelog from the original patch is accurate to
apply here?

Mingming