From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:14:46 -0600 Message-ID: <20070711111446.GO6417@schatzie.adilger.int> References: <1183275416.4010.125.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070710163027.1bf7e94e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1184119241.20193.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Mingming Cao Return-path: Received: from 74-0-229-162.T1.lbdsl.net ([74.0.229.162]:43192 "EHLO mail.clusterfs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756678AbXGKLOt (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:14:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1184119241.20193.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Jul 10, 2007 22:00 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > > Mingming Cao wrote: > > > > > This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. > > > > I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable > > changlog for those patches would do in a pinch. Preferable would be to > > write a proper changelog for this patch. > > > I found the original patch > http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=115091699809181&w=2 > > Andreas or Kalpak, is changelog from the original patch is accurate to > apply here? Mostly, yes, but the name of the feature flag has changed. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc.