From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:59:50 +0530 Message-ID: <4696FFBE.3030806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1183275416.4010.125.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070710163027.1bf7e94e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1184245126.4299.20.camel@garfield> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger To: Kalpak Shah Return-path: Received: from ausmtp04.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.152]:49318 "EHLO ausmtp04.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751093AbXGMEaG (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:30:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1184245126.4299.20.camel@garfield> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Kalpak Shah wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 >> Mingming Cao wrote: >> >>> This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. >> I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable >> changlog for those patches would do in a pinch. Preferable would be to >> write a proper changelog for this patch. > > The incremental patch contains a proper changelog describing the patch. > Instead of putting incremental patches it would be nice if we can have replacement patches. for the already existing patches with the comments addressed. For example if we have a review comment on the patch message ( commit log ) then adding an incremental patch doesn't help. -aneesh