From: "Jose R. Santos" Subject: Re: New e2fsprog doc on the ext4 wiki page. Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:35:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20070724113507.72ed9687@rx8> References: <20070724110741.65ade06e@rx8> <46A62672.70808@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:60160 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751609AbXGXQhH (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:37:07 -0400 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6OGb6N6002544 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:37:06 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.4) with ESMTP id l6OGb6u8205964 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:37:06 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l6OGb64d017885 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:37:06 -0600 Received: from austin.ibm.com (netmail2.austin.ibm.com [9.41.248.176]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6OGb5wA017854 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:37:06 -0600 In-Reply-To: <46A62672.70808@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:48:58 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote: > > > Jose R. Santos wrote: > > Hi folks > > > > > > > > ext4migrate: > > - Patches submited to the mailing list by Aneesh Kumar > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/1395 > > > > > I guess what we are looking at here is > > a) ext3 -> ext4 conversion would be done via option for defrag. This > conversion is now done via a ioctl. This is the suggested method for > defragmenting an ext3 inode (convert to ext4 and then defrag). > > b) small inode to large inode conversion is done via tune2fs -I < > new_inode_size> I have patches for this ready. Will be sending them > in a day or two. > > So the ext4migrate command may not be really needed. > > > -aneesh I will remove this item then and add the tune2fs changes. Is the defrag code going to be part of e2fsprogs or is this going to be a standalone app? -JRS