From: "Jose R. Santos" Subject: Re: Ext4 devel interlock meeting minutes (July 30, 2007) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 21:42:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20070803214222.2e0999f8@gara> References: <46B3B2A5.9000307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Avantika Mathur Return-path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:36300 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751609AbXHDCov (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Aug 2007 22:44:51 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l742ioat026134 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 22:44:50 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.4) with ESMTP id l742ioL6269436 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:44:50 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l742ioNm012278 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:44:50 -0600 Received: from austin.ibm.com (netmail2.austin.ibm.com [9.41.248.176]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l742ingk012258 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:44:50 -0600 In-Reply-To: <46B3B2A5.9000307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:56:37 -0700 Avantika Mathur wrote: > Flexible Block Groups: > - Jose is trying to see why fsck is not working. once this is resolved, > the feature will be complete. Not quite true. Solving the fsck issue means that we can do more thorough testing of the performance impacts of packaging meta-data closer together. The patches do not currently remove the 512TB limit imposed by the number of block groups, which is something that I also plan to address on this feature. -JRS