From: Dave Kleikamp Subject: Re: Patches for patch queue Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:21:58 +0000 Message-ID: <1187623318.6471.4.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> References: <46C3FA2D.9050200@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1187279120.6811.15.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mingming Cao , Avantika Mathur , linux-ext4 To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:37912 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759146AbXHTPWG (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:22:06 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7KFM5wH029225 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:22:05 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l7KFM3JX310108 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:22:03 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l7KFM2tU019837 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:22:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1187279120.6811.15.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 10:45 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:48 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can we get the below patches in patch queue. > > > > > > http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/ext-truncate-mutex.patch > > http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/ext3-4-migrate.patch > > http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/new-extent-function.patch > > http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/mballoc-core.patch > > http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/mballoc-fixup.patch > > scripts/checkpatch.pl spits out a lot of warnings against these patches. > Do you think you can clean them up first? As we discussed, I checked these into the patch queue. That way they can be more easily tested in the short term. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center