From: Mingming Cao Subject: Re: new mballoc patches. Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:30:45 -0700 Message-ID: <1189643445.4935.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <46E651E6.3070107@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <46E6AE84.8050600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <46E7DF34.8090209@bull.net> <46E8290F.7020307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: cmm@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Valerie Clement , linux-ext4 To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:34375 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751868AbXIMAar (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:30:47 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8D0Uknj008724 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:30:46 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l8D0UkHB533472 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:30:46 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8D0UjQW018528 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:30:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46E8290F.7020307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 23:29 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Valerie, > > > Valerie Clement wrote: > > Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > >> > >> running fsstress on ppc64 give me > >> EXT4-fs: group 9: 16384 blocks in bitmap, 32254 in gd > >> EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used: Allocating > >> block in system zone - block = 294915 > >> > >> EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_ext_find_extent: bad header in inode > >> #213792: invalid magic - magic 5e5e, entries 24158, max 24158(0), > >> depth 24158(0) > >> RTAS: event: 137875, Type: Platform Error, Severity: 2 > >> EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_ext_find_extent: bad header in inode > >> #232149: invalid magic - magic e5e5, entries 58853, max 58853(0), > >> depth 58853(0) > >> RTAS: event: 137876, Type: Platform Error, Severity: 2 > >> EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_ext_find_extent: bad header in inode > >> #214332: invalid magic - magic 0, entries 0, max 0(0), depth 0(0) > >> EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_ext_remove_space: bad header in > >> inode #232149: invalid magic - magic e5e5, entries 58853, max > >> 58853(0), depth 58853(0) > >> > >> -aneesh > > > > endian problem? > > When running sparse on fs/ext4/ (make C=2 CF="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__") : > > > > fs/ext4/extents.c:2570:12: warning: incorrect type in assignment > > (different base types) > > fs/ext4/extents.c:2570:12: expected unsigned long [unsigned] > > [assigned] allocated > > fs/ext4/extents.c:2570:12: got restricted unsigned short > > [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] ee_len > > > > I think the following line in extents.c > > allocated = newex.ee_len; > > should be replaced by > > allocated = le16_to_cpu(newex.ee_len); > > > > > > > Yes i guess that is the issue. fsstress is now running for the last 30 minutes without any error. > > I have updated the patch series at > > http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/ > Thanks Aneesh. These changes will show in 2.6.23-rc5 ext4 patch queue. > Changes: > a) mballoc patch fixes for sparse warning > b) ext4_i_version_hi_2.patch patch fixes for sparse warning > c) Added commit message for ext4_uninit_blockgroup.patch That's very helpful. I think this might ready to merge for 2.6.24. > d) Added new patch sparse-fix.patch ( this can be pushed to upstream separately) This patch has sparse fix for uninit block group, so I fold that part to the the ext4_uninit_blockgroup.patch. I moved this patch to the beginning of the series as this fix should be merged to upstream separately. Mingming > > > The complete patch set in > http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/ext4-patch-queue.tar > > > -aneesh > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html