From: Mingming Cao Subject: Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:35:47 -0700 Message-ID: <1190133347.3819.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070902152801.GA19962@infradead.org> <20070903134043.GB28962@infradead.org> <20070903193308.GA7771@infradead.org> <1189796027.3841.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1190057391.3845.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1190066466.31220.5.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <1190069851.6725.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070918090407.GA671@infradead.org> Reply-To: cmm@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Badari Pulavarty , Christoph Lameter , linux-fsdevel , ext4 development , lkml To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070918090407.GA671@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 10:04 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:57:31PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > > Here is the incremental small cleanup patch. > > > > Remove kamlloc usages in jbd/jbd2 and consistently use jbd_kmalloc/jbd2_malloc. > > Shouldn't we kill jbd_kmalloc instead? > It seems useful to me to keep jbd_kmalloc/jbd_free. They are central places to handle memory (de)allocation(