From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH] obsolete libcom-err for SuSE e2fsprogs Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:40:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20070924124035.GA4209@thunk.org> References: <20070919061404.GA1628@schatzie.adilger.int> <46F1CFC0.3070801@redhat.com> <20070920050923.GX32520@schatzie.adilger.int> <46F2D678.4060203@redhat.com> <20070920215427.GL30221@thunk.org> <20070924092539.GC2819@petra.dvoda.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Sandeen , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, List util-linux-ng To: Karel Zak Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070924092539.GC2819-CxBs/XhZ2BtHjqfyn1fVYA@public.gmane.org> Sender: util-linux-ng-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:25:39AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > > > Nope, there isn't much rationale unless we also split out fsck, so > > util-linux-ng is open for fsck :-) It's something I'm considering, but at the moment I've got some higher priority (ext4) work that I'm focusing on. What would you think about moving libblkid and the libdisk from xfsprogs into util-linux-ng? That's things that I've been batting around doing, although that means we end up moving more libraries that distros would probably want separated into different packages into util-linux-ng.... - Ted