From: Mingming Cao Subject: Re: patch queue updated Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:33:25 -0700 Message-ID: <1192037606.3880.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <470CBFFF.3080308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1192032053.3880.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <470CFAB4.8080408@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: cmm@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4 To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:53352 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754793AbXJJRdo (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:33:44 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9AHXb5o024382 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:33:37 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l9AHXRuX345030 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:33:32 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l9AHXQOr025696 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:33:27 -0600 In-Reply-To: <470CFAB4.8080408@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 21:45 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > Mingming Cao wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 17:35 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > >> I have updated the patch queue at > >> > >> http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/ > >> > >> http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/ext4-patch-queue.tar > >> > >> Changes: > >> a) Add large-file-blocktype.patch large-file.patch patch. > > > > Could you send them out separately? I noticed that your queue is not > > based on the last ext4 patch queue. You modified mballoc-core.patch > > directly with large file block type changes...but your updated > > mballoc-core.patch doesn't have the latest proc fs fix from Ted. > > > > It has the changes. http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/mballoc-core.patch > I searched for PROC_FS . I did a git pull on patch queue before updating the patches. > > > > > > I would appreciate if you separete the largeblocktype changes for > > mballoc out of the core mballoc changes, as that patch is getting really > > big already. > > > >> b) Add the stable-boundary-patch with dummy change > >> c) Add stable-boundary-undo.patch which undo the above dummy change. > > > > The stable-boundary patch is being removed from ext4 patch queue,as some > > tools expect a meaning code diff to apply any patch. > > > > That is why i added a dummy change which is reverted by the later patch. > I see your intention is to bring back the boundary patch which doesn't upset the tools but also doesn't have any code impact to the tree. Okay, updated ext4-patch-queue with your updates. > > -aneeshh- > > -aneesh