From: "Jose R. Santos" Subject: [PATCH 00/13][e2fsprogs] Uninit block group break down Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:15:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20071011191559.4599.69332.stgit@gara> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:60078 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755825AbXJKTQL (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:16:11 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9BJG6KZ001443 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:16:06 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l9BJG6C4124578 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:16:06 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l9BJFtS4028085 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:15:55 -0400 Received: from austin.ibm.com (netmail2.austin.ibm.com [9.41.248.176]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9BJFtXq027374 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:15:55 -0400 Received: from [127.0.1.1] (wecm-9-67-39-149.wecm.ibm.com [9.67.39.149]) by austin.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l9BJFie6035100 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:15:45 -0500 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org The Uninit block group patch is painful to review since it's quite a large patch. Since simple patches are easier to review, I decided to break down the patch into smaller logical pieces that should be easier to review, clean and fix. The patch is based from the latest e2fsprogs git tree and aside from a compile test (which fails on PPC64 because of missing ext2fs_swab_group_desc()), I have not fully tested these patches. My intent here is to get some of the back log of patches in better shape for eventual inclussion into Ted's tree. Aside from the breakdown, this is essentially the same patch that Avantika submitted to the mailing list a couple of weeks ago with some minor changer to allow it to apply on the latest git tree. Let me know what you folks think. -JRS