From: "Bram Neijt" Subject: Re: User permissions or UID/GIDs for portable disks? Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 18:07:36 +0100 Message-ID: <46c2f4ab0711011007l62437ca2jf789069a6c5cbdb4@mail.gmail.com> References: <46c2f4ab0710241110o582dcc27pbd6d2c31474b526b@mail.gmail.com> <1193279915.25351.18.camel@eric-laptop> <1193320570.12664.19.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.230]:12654 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753331AbXKARHl (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:07:41 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so450134nze for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:07:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1193320570.12664.19.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Thanks to Dave and Eric for their replies. I'm moving the feature discussion to a higher level (pmount) and I've opened a blueprint on it[1] with more words on why I think it's a problem[2]. This means that I'm leaving this thread and closing it with this mail. I would like to thank everybody who replied and read this, for their help. Greetings, Bram [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/launchpad/+spec/usermount-permission-granting [2] http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dqqr5r6_41w7hfbx On 10/25/07, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 19:38 -0700, Eric wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 20:10 +0200, Bram Neijt wrote: > > > One of the best solutions I can come up with is if the filesystem > > > would allow for a switch that would help ignore these permissions as > > > part of the filesystem. > > > > Ignoring file permissions on removable, user-supplied media sounds like > > something that ought to be done above the level of individual > > filesystems, just like how we ignore device files and suid/sgid files in > > certain cases. Maybe this is something that ought to be one level up > > from the ext2/3/4 filesystem driver? > > It would be a nice feature to implement at a higher level. A lot of > file systems do something like this. > > > In any case, this raises interesting questions. If we ignore permissions > > on removable media, then anyone logged into your work computer (to which > > you do not have root access) will be able to muck about with your files. > > Is that something you want? > > Mount options should override on-media permissions, but those overriding > permissions could still deny access to others: > > mount -o uid=1000,gid=1000,fmask=137,dmask=027 /dev/sdb1 /mnt/usbstick > > -- > David Kleikamp > IBM Linux Technology Center > >