From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: e2fsprogs-interim scm tree?
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:56:41 -0600
Message-ID: <4742F5A9.3070301@redhat.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.0.99999.0711200128130.7426@sheep.housecafe.de> <20071120031127.GB13125@thunk.org> <14319.62.180.231.196.1195554243.squirrel@housecafe.dyndns.org> <20071120140420.GC13125@thunk.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20071120140420.GC13125@thunk.org>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org

Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:24:03AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
>>> Note that the userspace code still needs a lot of work.
>>> It's for this reason that I haven't been recommending people use it for
>>> production systems just yet.
>> Understood. But the more ppl testing your stuff the better, right?
> 
> Oh, absolutely.  I just don't think it's fair to encourage people to
> use something that might cause them to risk their data unless they are
> going into it with their eyes wide open.

Please do report any problems you find, though.  Ted has said that the
sourceforge bugtracker is the right place to do this for now.

-Eric (remembering he has a bug to report, too)