From: David Howells Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] 64-bit i_version: afs fixes Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:23:45 +0000 Message-ID: <21098.1196375025@redhat.com> References: <200711292052.lATKqnvt006831@imap1.linux-foundation.org> Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, cmm@us.ibm.com, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jean-noel.cordenner@bull.net To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33774 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761354AbXK2WYw (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:24:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200711292052.lATKqnvt006831@imap1.linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > - _leave(" = 0 { vn=%u u=%u } -> { ino=%lu v=%lu }", > + _leave(" = 0 { vn=%u u=%u } -> { ino=%lu v=%llu }", > fid.vnode, > fid.unique, > dentry->d_inode->i_ino, > - dentry->d_inode->i_version); > + (unsigned long long)dentry->d_inode->i_version); Hmmm... In AFS's case this is overkill... The value contained in i_version is going to be a 32-bit number because that's all the protocol supports. David