From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: Coverity testing freely available Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 07:10:39 -0500 Message-ID: <20071201121039.GD28558@thunk.org> References: <20070716085814.GD5992@schatzie.adilger.int> <47509460.40706@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:48404 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751895AbXLARfJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:35:09 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47509460.40706@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:53:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Andreas Dilger wrote: > > Hi, > > I've recently found scan.coverity.com, which allows OSS-licensed projects > > to be run under Coverity to find defects available in the code. I think > > that e2fsprogs should be included there, even if some people run e2fsprogs > > under Coverity separately. This allows the e2fsprogs developers to find > > and fix the bugs more easily. > > > > I don't see e2fsprogs on the website yet. Anyone care if I go ahead & > ask that e2fsprogs be included? I tried sending e-mail to Coverity on July 16th, and never got a reply. Feel free to give it a try.... - Ted