From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: Test script for 64KB blocksize Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:35:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20071206183522.GN3604@webber.adilger.int> References: <20071206142120.GC6396@duck.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from mail.clusterfs.com ([74.0.229.162]:50240 "EHLO mail.clusterfs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751794AbXLFSfY (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:35:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071206142120.GC6396@duck.suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Dec 06, 2007 15:21 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > attached is a test script which verifies that 64KB blocksize works in the > modified code paths. It creates a filesystem with 64KB blocksize and > excercises e2image, debugfs (and thus libext2fs) and e2fsck on it. You only > need to modify paths to e2fsprogs in the first few lines of the script. > Also if you don't apply a patch for 2-block lost+found from Andreas, you > need to disable the first test which would fail otherwise. This would be well suited to be added to e2fsprogs/tests with what looks to be relatively few changes. That would ensure that it runs forever in the future. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.