From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1: some issues on sparc64 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 01:03:11 -0800 Message-ID: <20071209010311.5bc7318d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20071204211701.994dfce6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200712081920.28748.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> <20071208102239.2457eeaa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071209.004517.201813773.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:58208 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750732AbXLIJDS (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2007 04:03:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071209.004517.201813773.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:45:17 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: > From: Andrew Morton > Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:22:39 -0800 > > > That's > > > > J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_jbddirty(bh)); > > > > at the end of journal_unmap_buffer(). > > > > I don't recall seeing that before and I can't think of anything we've > > done recently which could cause it, sorry. > > If the per-cpu data patches are in the -mm tree that is the first > place I would start looking at for possible cause. They aren't. The dust hadn't settled enough on those when Christoph shot through on vacation.