From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:41:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20080102174157.GD3351@webber.adilger.int> References: <20080102013218.GO27566@does.not.exist> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Return-path: Received: from mail.clusterfs.com ([74.0.229.162]:33748 "EHLO mail.clusterfs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751091AbYABRl7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:41:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080102013218.GO27566@does.not.exist> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Jan 02, 2008 03:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels, > but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel > offered it - and that's definitely not intended. > > Anyone who _really_ wants to test ext4 should anyway be able to do the > trivial change of removing the "depends on BROKEN" line. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ config EXT3_FS_SECURITY > > config EXT4DEV_FS > tristate "Ext4dev/ext4 extended fs support development (EXPERIMENTAL)" > - depends on EXPERIMENTAL > + depends on BROKEN > select JBD2 > select CRC16 > help Isn't CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL enough? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.