From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:41:37 -0500 Message-ID: <11223.1199425297@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <20080102013218.GO27566@does.not.exist> <20080102174157.GD3351@webber.adilger.int> <20080102195146.GB15898@does.not.exist> <1199310692.5786.53.camel@dione> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1199425297_4991P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Bunk , sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Anopolsky Return-path: In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:51:32 PST." <1199310692.5786.53.camel@dione> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1199425297_4991P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:51:32 PST, Eric Anopolsky said: > their own kernels in the first place. IMHO, it's reasonable to expect > the small minority of Linux users who want to compile their own kernels > to learn that "EXPERIMENTAL" means something. And what, exactly, does it mean, given that there's a bunch of stuff that's tagged EXPERIMENTAL that's more solid/tested than a lot of stuff that *isn't* marked with it? --==_Exmh_1199425297_4991P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHfccRcC3lWbTT17ARAtmXAKDs4mqrhvnW+ht3dOT5lSNu+ZazIACfbZDG 3Zmkfv0FztJybw/6GZo6rko= =vhof -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1199425297_4991P--