From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Use superblock s_raid_stripe_width as stripe size during block allocation. Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:21:10 -0600 Message-ID: <47850286.80001@redhat.com> References: <1199898469-10369-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, tytso@mit.edu, adilger@sun.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:34349 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752306AbYAIRW5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:22:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1199898469-10369-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > The stipe size used during block allocation is calculated as below. > a) if we specify a stripe= option using mount time. Use that value. > b) if not use the value specified in super block. > b) If the value specfied at mount time is greater than blocks per group use > the value specified ini the super block. > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > --- > fs/ext4/super.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > index db1edc8..10330eb 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > @@ -2136,6 +2136,16 @@ static int ext4_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > sbi->s_rsv_window_head.rsv_alloc_hit = 0; > sbi->s_rsv_window_head.rsv_goal_size = 0; > ext4_rsv_window_add(sb, &sbi->s_rsv_window_head); > + /* > + * set the stripe size. If we have specified it via mount option, then > + * use the mount option value. If the value specified at mount time is > + * greater than the blocks per group use the super block value. > + * Allocator needs it be less than blocks per group. > + */ > + if (!sbi->s_stripe || > + sbi->s_stripe >= sbi->s_blocks_per_group) { Is stripe == s_blocks_per_group problematic? Should we warn/printk in the case that the specified size is too big? Thanks, -Eric > + sbi->s_stripe = le32_to_cpu(es->s_raid_stripe_width); > + } > > /* > * set up enough so that it can read an inode