From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: BUG_ON at mballoc.c:3752 Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:33:54 -0600 Message-ID: <47AC7662.8000706@redhat.com> References: <20080131140137.GA20780@alice> <20080131154207.GA22201@alice> <20080204060055.GC7494@skywalker> <1202335188.6886.15.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> <20080207125548.GA8701@skywalker> <20080208150705.GA9111@alice> <47AC7492.1050907@redhat.com> <20080208153135.GB9111@alice> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp To: Eric Sesterhenn Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37304 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756527AbYBHPhG (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:37:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080208153135.GB9111@alice> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > * Eric Sandeen (sandeen@redhat.com) wrote: >> Eric Sesterhenn wrote: >>>> Eric , >>>> can you run the test with below patch and see if this makes any >>>> difference ?. I know we are not fixing any bugs in the below patch. >>> ok, i checked out the old version again and applied both patches, >>> the BUG is gone (no surprise) >>> In the case where it would have hit the BUG i now get the following message: >>> >>> [ 740.400288] Aborting journal on device loop0. >> No message before that about *why* it aborted? > > assumed the stuff was from the previous runs > > [ 735.424574] EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_generate_buddy: > EXT4-fs: group 0: 6590 blocks in bitmap, 6600 in gd > [ 740.400288] Aborting journal on device loop0. There it is, thanks. Just making sure :) -Eric