From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: What's cooking in e2fsprogs.git (topics) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:08:11 -0600 Message-ID: <47AFD83B.7060007@redhat.com> References: <20071217171100.GA7070@thunk.org> <20080211045107.GB25089@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:57166 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750859AbYBKFIg (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:08:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080211045107.GB25089@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Theodore Tso wrote: > I'ts been a while since I've pushed one of these out. This updates pu > against the latest "next" branch, so we can make sure all of the > changes that had been folded into "maint" is included on the pu > branch. It also includes more work on the tt/extents patches. > Tune2fs and e2image are now functional with extents, and e2fsck has > more extents checking added. Still a bit more work to be done there, > and I also have to add code to deal with symlinks that have the > EXTENTS_FL flag set. > > I've dropped the js/flex-bg branch since it had conflicts with the > on-disk bg flags, and it had conflicts with the exsting patches that > caused me concern. Jose, once you regenerate the patch and deal with > comments, I'll add it back in. > > My TODO list: > > finish e2fsck extents support > more flexible mke2fs.conf handling > EXT4 -- allow mke2fs 8TB without -f ext3 should be fine as well, right? And I think Josef sent a patch... -Eric