From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ext4: Fix kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:910! Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:51:34 -0600 Message-ID: <47B5B506.7020201@redhat.com> References: <1203006909.8970.20.camel@ext1.frec.bull.fr> <47B46E71.805@redhat.com> <47B5AD44.8010305@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4 To: Valerie Clement Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:45437 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750822AbYBOPwI (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:52:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47B5AD44.8010305@bull.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Valerie Clement wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Valerie Clement wrote: >>> Fix kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:910! >>> >>> From: Valerie Clement >>> >>> With the flex_bg feature enabled, a large file creation oopses the >>> kernel. >> Valerie, what's the specific testcase for this? >> >> Thanks, >> -Eric > I just did a simple dd, > dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test/foo bs=1M count=8k > on an ext4 filesystem with the uninit_groups, lazy_bg and flex_bg > features enabled and the default mount options. Ok, thanks Valerie. It's just always nice to know exactly how to reproduce a problem that a patch fixes, IMHO. -Eric