From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH] UPDATED: building e2fsprogs-interim Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:25:42 -0500 Message-ID: <20080216042542.GD26734@mit.edu> References: <47B487C4.8010602@redhat.com> <47B5E188.6080502@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ext4 development To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.ORG ([69.25.196.31]:38317 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751154AbYBPGRy (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:17:54 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47B5E188.6080502@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:01:28PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > An update; running through the whole fedora build turned up another > one (csum.o). Out of curiosity do things like ext2_fs.h (which are not > generated) really need to be listed as dependencies? Well, in an RPM build you probably don't need them, no. But they are useful in an developer tree because if ext2_fs.h gets modified, it's good to recompile all source files that include it --- just to make sure any errors in the header file get caught. - Ted