From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/journal.c: cleanups Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:31:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20080218133127.GB12568@mit.edu> References: <20080217081935.GN3848@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080218070439.GG3029@webber.adilger.int> <20080218071229.GA1459@elte.hu> <20080218114936.GM8905@mit.edu> <20080218125702.GB15044@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andreas Dilger , Adrian Bunk , sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.org ([69.25.196.31]:37058 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760471AbYBRNbu (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:31:50 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080218125702.GB15044@elte.hu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > So please deal with it like most other subsystem maintainers do and stop > complaining about "code churn" - nobody but you changes the ext3 > codebase, it's one of the codebases least affected by general kernel > flux, it's an ultimate "leaf" subsystem. Right, sorry. I misread the filename; I thought this was against fs/jbd2, instead of fs/jbd. - Ted