From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: What's cooking in e2fsprogs.git (topics) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:49:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20080229224953.GK8968@mit.edu> References: <20071217171100.GA7070@thunk.org> <20080211045107.GB25089@mit.edu> <20080219050945.GU25098@mit.edu> <20080229154333.GC8968@mit.edu> <20080229195948.GN2997@webber.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU ([18.7.7.80]:59660 "EHLO biscayne-one-station.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753988AbYB2Wt6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:49:58 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080229195948.GN2997@webber.adilger.int> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:59:48AM -0800, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Does this test case have both flexbg and uninit_groups? Alternately, > maybe some part of the e2fsck fixup code is allocating blocks in the > group, but doesn't know that the UNINIT flag needs to be cleared. Yes, it does include both; this describes what was going on in the 'pu' branch. - Ted