From: Mingming Cao Subject: Re: ext4-mm-delalloc-ext4.patch Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:12:44 -0800 Message-ID: <1204585964.3636.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080229010555.21ab9c77.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1204305996.3629.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080303130823.ed6991a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reply-To: cmm@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:37405 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753269AbYCCXNN (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:13:13 -0500 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m23NFC0s019177 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:15:12 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m23NDDTD240406 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:13:13 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m23NDCHt028737 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:13:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080303130823.ed6991a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 13:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:26:36 -0800 > Mingming Cao wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 01:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > generic_commit_write() is scheduled for removal in 2.6.26 and is > > > removed already from -mm. > > > > > > Please switch to the new write_begin/write_end interface. > > > > I have a patch for that, sent to linux-ext4 last week. I will merge it > > to the parent patch and update in ext4 patch queue. > > > > ext4: use write_begin/write_end in delalloc instead of prepare_write() > > From: Mingming Cao > > Thanks. But this change still isn't at > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/LATEST/broken-out/, > so ext4 is still a no-build for me. > Oh, sorry about the confusion. What I mean by "ext4 patch queue" is a cutting edge ext4 development tree, which is not intend for mm or upstream inclusion. I have asked Ted this morning to update the "official" ext4 patch queue at kernel.org, which is visiable to you and the world. I can't update it myself. Best regards, Mingming