From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [E2FSPROGS, RFC] New mke2fs types parsing Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:11:32 -0500 Message-ID: <47DFBF84.5070207@redhat.com> References: <47BC76A9.307@redhat.com> <20080220222019.GG30305@mit.edu> <47DEE2AE.1050105@redhat.com> <20080318022053.GL8368@mit.edu> <47DF35CC.7020604@redhat.com> <20080318042339.GO8368@mit.edu> <47DF5045.1000108@redhat.com> <20080318110145.GQ8368@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:33031 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752637AbYCRNL4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:11:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080318110145.GQ8368@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Theodore Tso wrote: > I rejected this approach originally because it would mean reusing the > -t option right away. But maybe this would be easier for users to > understand, and easier to document in the man pages, and maybe that's > an overriding consideration. well, I doubt the man page should override much ;) I just wanted to air the concerns & my ideas... if, having considered them, you're still happy with the original approach, that's fine with me. Thanks, -Eric