From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ext4 online defrag header file changes Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:46:17 +0530 Message-ID: <20080324111617.GA14290@skywalker> References: <200803141202.AA00330@TNESG9526.rs.jp.nec.com> <20080314125848.GE3542@webber.adilger.int> <47DE0F8D.2060106@rs.jp.nec.com> <20080317170846.GE3542@webber.adilger.int> <47E789E6.6000806@rs.jp.nec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andreas Dilger , cmm@us.ibm.com, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Akira Fujita Return-path: Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.6]:49324 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757724AbYCXLQX (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:16:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47E789E6.6000806@rs.jp.nec.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 08:00:54PM +0900, Akira Fujita wrote: >> >> > Is EXT4_IOC_FIEMAP going to be added to the ext4 patch queue? > I will try to use EXT4_IOC_FIEMAP instead of EXT4_IOC_EXTENTS_INFO > in ext4 online defrag when kernel supports it. Can you also look at the sparse warnings with the patches ? -aneesh