From: Joshua Hoblitt Subject: Re: ext4 volume > 16TB possible? Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:05:04 -1000 Message-ID: <20080408180504.GA8435@ifa.hawaii.edu> References: <20080407210237.GO23213@ifa.hawaii.edu> <20080408092001.203605fd@gara.konoha.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Jose R. Santos" Return-path: Received: from moa.IfA.Hawaii.Edu ([128.171.168.48]:33148 "EHLO moa.ifa.hawaii.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753597AbYDHSTD (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:19:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080408092001.203605fd@gara.konoha.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OK - I am happy to test when this feature is merged. Thanks, -J -- On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:20:01AM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote: > On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:02:37 -1000 > Joshua Hoblitt wrote: >=20 > > Hi Folks, > >=20 > > Is there as of yet a means of creating a large ext4 filesystem? mke2fs > > as of 1.40.8 is still limited to creating ext3 filesystems at 16TB. >=20 > Support for 64-bit block number is not yet available on e2fsprogs. It > is being worked on but other features currently have higher priority > that this so its hard to say when it will be done. >=20 > -JRS --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH+7PQWa2BU+b7tU0RArjMAJ4vEyllSHH+yVESsQt9xxXb5Qp0NwCfUAy5 xEBNBc+gAutmWilYhNvkL2g= =j5Zi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--