From: Christian Kujau Subject: Re: e2fsck (git) on ext4: unsupported feature(s): huge_file Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 00:40:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <47FBB24D.90807@yahoo.de> <47FBBB59.3020506@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: supersud501 , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from ns2.g-housing.de ([81.169.133.75]:43214 "EHLO mail.g-house.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751758AbYDHWkQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:40:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47FBBB59.3020506@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Oh, and for what it's worth, fsck support for ext4 is incomplete, even > in git. "Incomplete", but usable I may add. I've had a few (I/O related) crashes and ext4 told me that running e2fsck was recommended. I did several times and it went ok. > That accounts for lots of the "dev" part in "ext4dev." Yeah, I won't argue with that statement :) my 2 cents... C. -- BOFH excuse #24: network packets travelling uphill (use a carrier pigeon)