From: supersud501 Subject: Re: e2fsck (git) on ext4: unsupported feature(s): huge_file Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:23:10 +0200 Message-ID: <47FD179E.5030103@yahoo.de> References: <47FBB24D.90807@yahoo.de> <47FBBB13.7060501@redhat.com> <47FBCB44.1050500@yahoo.de> <20080408210048.GA16108@mit.edu> <47FC892C.5080000@yahoo.de> <20080409161117.GB26924@mit.edu> <47FD02A6.9090708@yahoo.de> <20080409185938.GE26924@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Theodore Tso , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from n7a.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.155]:41378 "HELO n7a.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758482AbYDIUSF (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:18:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080409185938.GE26924@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Theodore Tso wrote: >> Yeah, i'm getting some (~80) errors about i blocks being wrong (besides >> errors that a fast symlink has extents_fl set), and the error is always >> from the type: "i_blocks is x, should be x+8", so it always wants to add 8 >> to the existing number. is this the mentioned miscalculation? > > x+8, or x*8? I would have expected the latter. > really "x+8" - but since those are only "few" errors (~80 in opposite to the 1000++ i've with the patched version), they might not be related to my "huge_file" problem.