From: "Jose R. Santos" Subject: Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL][e2fsprogs] Rename uninit_groups to uninit_bg. Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:05:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20080410120553.56a4ed7c@gara.konoha.net> References: <20080402140221.30632.62083.stgit@gara.konoha.net> <20080410163314.GA5693@webber.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:35763 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751657AbYDJRGP (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:06:15 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3AH6AiY027733 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:06:10 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m3AH6Abi251166 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:06:10 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m3AH69Bk006378 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:06:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080410163314.GA5693@webber.adilger.int> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:33:14 -0600 Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Apr 02, 2008 09:03 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote: > > Rename uninit_groups to uninit_bg. > > > > > > > > One of these things is not like the others, > > One of these things just doesn't belong, > > Can you tell which thing is not like the others > > By the time I finish my song? > > by Joe Raposo > > Jose, > I don't disagree with this change, but can you please keep compatibility > with the old name for some time, as we have been using the "uninit_groups" > name for some time already. I thought that since the uninit patches where still cooking in the pu branch and not made part of any official release, changing a feature name without caring about backward compatibility was OK. Or is it to maintain compatibility with Luster? > > diff --git a/lib/e2p/feature.c b/lib/e2p/feature.c > > index cf37447..3fc4f91 100644 > > --- a/lib/e2p/feature.c > > +++ b/lib/e2p/feature.c > > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static struct feature feature_list[] = { > > { E2P_FEATURE_RO_INCOMPAT, EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_HUGE_FILE, > > "huge_file" }, > > { E2P_FEATURE_RO_INCOMPAT, EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM, > > - "uninit_groups" }, > > + "uninit_bg" }, > > I think we just need an additional stanza here after this one which has > the old name in it. That way lookup-by-value will find uninit_bg, and > lookup-by-name will still work. I will send another patch with the added stanza. > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger > Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group > Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. > -JRS