From: supersud501 Subject: Re: e2fsck (git) on ext4: unsupported feature(s): huge_file Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:38:47 +0200 Message-ID: <47FF69E7.8070807@yahoo.de> References: <47FBB24D.90807@yahoo.de> <47FBBB13.7060501@redhat.com> <47FBCB44.1050500@yahoo.de> <20080408210048.GA16108@mit.edu> <47FC892C.5080000@yahoo.de> <20080409161117.GB26924@mit.edu> <47FD0724.4060307@yahoo.de> <20080409190634.GA9430@mit.edu> <47FD16DC.1090502@yahoo.de> <20080409210856.GD9430@mit.edu> <20080411130412.GA10551@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Sandeen , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from n29.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([87.248.110.146]:20858 "HELO n29.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751768AbYDKNix (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:38:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080411130412.GA10551@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:08:56PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: >> Whoops, I had a one-character typo in e2fsck. Try this patch >> instead.... (made against git the next branch). > > Hi, have you had a chance to try this updated patch? > > Thanks, > > - Ted > yes, i had, the mass of errors were not there anymore. and the errors of the type "i_blocks is x, should be y" were not always of the type x+8 like before but more random, so that it looked like as if it was correcting them right. unfortunately i cannot make any further tests, because i just reformatted the drive with ext3, to avoid further complications (and to be able to use the drive on windows machines, too). my second (and now only) ext4dev test-filesystem has no huge_file flag, so i think i'm out of further testing the patch. regards, supersud501